After major
tragedies, the same thing happens: People say they are sending “thoughts and
prayers.”
In the last few
months, thoughts and prayers have been sent about hurricanes in Puerto Rico,
Houston and Florida; to Edmonton following that city’s terrorist attack; and,
of course, to Las Vegas following the deadly shooting.
Today, most
people seem to send their thoughts and prayers by social media. But they also
are shared by politicians.
Research by Ben Rowen in Atlantic shows
that since 1995 there were 4,139 instances in which a congressperson expressed
thoughts and prayers in the Senate or House.
As Rowen points
out, “given that the House has averaged 138 days in session a year and the
Senate 162 since 2001, this equates to close to one ‘thoughts and prayers’
entered into the record per workday on the Hill.”
In Canada, a
search of Hansard going back to 1994 shows that “thoughts and prayers” were
shared only 540 times in Parliament, mostly by Conservatives.
The practice
has also produced a backlash—don’t just pray, do something! That’s how Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy saw it after the Las Vegas
shootings.
To his colleagues who sent thoughts and prayers, but who refuse to try to check the proliferation of
guns in that country, he tweeted: “Your
cowardice to act cannot be whitewashed by thoughts and prayers. None of this
ends unless we do something to stop it.”
Most
would agree that prayer without action is meaningless. But does that mean that sending
thoughts and prayers, in themselves, is a bad thing?
I
don’t know what it means to send thoughts. There are some who believe that energy
can travel across space to positively impact other people. But this seems to be
a minority view.
As
for prayer, lots of people say they do that—an
Angus Reid survey from a year ago
found that 86 percent of Canadians pray at least once a month or more.
Fifty-nine
percent of the time they pray to ask God for help; 35 percent of the time they pray
for God to help others.
And
what about the effect of those prayers? The same study found that 44 percent of
Canadians said their prayers are answered “sometimes.” Twenty-four percent said
they were answered “often,’ and 11 percent said “always.”
But
not all the effects of prayer are for others. It turns out praying also
benefits the one who is doing it. Eighty-sex percent of Canadians said praying
added something to their own lives.
In his book The Psychology of Prayer: A Scientific
Approach, Kevin
Ladd, a former pastor and associate professor of psychology at Indiana
University, confirms this. For him, a major function of prayer “is the key role
it plays in helping people cope with the problems encountered in social living.”
Prayer, he
says, is significant for helping people deal with things like relationships,
illness and death. Pausing to pray also has a calming effect, generates a sense of
peace, and reduces stress.
“That prayer
helps one better cope and adjust to life’s challenges has become increasingly
evident over time,” he states.
Today we seem
to be awash in tragedy and misery—natural disasters, refugee flight, famine,
mass shootings. It is easy to be overwhelmed and feel powerless to do anything
to help. We want to help, but what can we do?
At times like
that, prayer might be the only thing, for those who are suffering and also for
our own peace of mind.
Of course, we shouldn’t
only send thoughts and prayers—we should also donate money, give blood, volunteer,
make a casserole for a neighbour in distress or do anything else that might
make a practical difference in the lives of those who are suffering.
A
final word from Ladd about
why people pray.
Prayer, he
writes, “is a paradoxical spiritual practice that does not guarantee
predictably discernible efficacy at every turn. It’s not a cosmic vending
machine. So why do people pray? Because they have faith that it is the right
thing for them to do.”
And to that I
can only say: “Amen.”
From the Oct. 14 Winnipeg Free Press.
From the Oct. 14 Winnipeg Free Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment